Difference between revisions of "Talk:New Level-Dependent Benefits (3.5e Variant Rule)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
m |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::'Inherent' seems to be what Havvy meant. However, 'enhancement' means 'making better', so I think semantically it still fits. Additionally, an enhancement bonus to attack rolls and damage rolls lets you damage incorporeal stuff, so I have a game-mechanical reason for leaving that alone. - [[User:MisterSinister|MisterSinister]] 10:13, 27 February 2011 (UTC) | ::'Inherent' seems to be what Havvy meant. However, 'enhancement' means 'making better', so I think semantically it still fits. Additionally, an enhancement bonus to attack rolls and damage rolls lets you damage incorporeal stuff, so I have a game-mechanical reason for leaving that alone. - [[User:MisterSinister|MisterSinister]] 10:13, 27 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Are you supposed to not be able to use regular enhancement bonus items and other such number giving items? if so you should write that in, otherwise inexperienced or inattentive people will not figure out if that was your intent.--[[User:Stryker|Stryker]] 11:44, 1 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:44, 1 March 2011
Might I suggest renaming the bonuses to "Inherit"? Magic enhances you, while levels are an inherit growth in power, no? --Havvy 07:51, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Inherent? Inherited? -- Jota 22:06, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- 'Inherent' seems to be what Havvy meant. However, 'enhancement' means 'making better', so I think semantically it still fits. Additionally, an enhancement bonus to attack rolls and damage rolls lets you damage incorporeal stuff, so I have a game-mechanical reason for leaving that alone. - MisterSinister 10:13, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- Are you supposed to not be able to use regular enhancement bonus items and other such number giving items? if so you should write that in, otherwise inexperienced or inattentive people will not figure out if that was your intent.--Stryker 11:44, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
