Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cross-Discipline Maneuvers (3.5e Variant Rule)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
m (→Acquisition) |
m (→Acquisition) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The test should clarify whether you need to have access to both disciplines or not. For instance, could a Warblade take Brutal Murder by way of having access to Tiger Claw, or does their lack of access to Shadow Hand prevent it? --[[User:DanielDraco|DanielDraco]] 09:20, 24 August 2012 (UTC) | The test should clarify whether you need to have access to both disciplines or not. For instance, could a Warblade take Brutal Murder by way of having access to Tiger Claw, or does their lack of access to Shadow Hand prevent it? --[[User:DanielDraco|DanielDraco]] 09:20, 24 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Actually, that was a bad example, because the maneuver's prerequisites answer that. But the rules text does not eliminate the possibility of cross-discipline maneuvers that lack prerequisites entirely, or that lack prerequisites for one of the two disciplines. So it should still be clarified. --[[User:DanielDraco|DanielDraco]] 09:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC) | :Actually, that was a bad example, because the maneuver's prerequisites answer that. But the rules text does not eliminate the possibility of cross-discipline maneuvers that lack prerequisites entirely, or that lack prerequisites for one of the two disciplines. So it should still be clarified. --[[User:DanielDraco|DanielDraco]] 09:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::Added a line about that. It's a requirement for authors now. | + | ::Added a line about that. It's a requirement for authors now. --[[User:Havvy|Havvy]] 00:20, 25 August 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:20, 25 August 2012
Acquisition[edit]
The test should clarify whether you need to have access to both disciplines or not. For instance, could a Warblade take Brutal Murder by way of having access to Tiger Claw, or does their lack of access to Shadow Hand prevent it? --DanielDraco 09:20, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, that was a bad example, because the maneuver's prerequisites answer that. But the rules text does not eliminate the possibility of cross-discipline maneuvers that lack prerequisites entirely, or that lack prerequisites for one of the two disciplines. So it should still be clarified. --DanielDraco 09:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Added a line about that. It's a requirement for authors now. --Havvy 00:20, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
