Difference between revisions of "Talk:There Is Logic In What He Says (3.5e Skill Trick)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(We use logic here)
 
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
::::I did not consider that. Obviously, you are correct. - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup>  02:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 
::::I did not consider that. Obviously, you are correct. - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup>  02:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 +
 +
:::::We already have double naming between Jack of all Trades and Jack of All Trades.  We don't need more of it.  --[[User:Undead Knave|Undead_Knave]] ([[User talk:Undead Knave|talk]]) 04:47, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:47, 10 April 2016

We use logic here[edit]

Sometimes doesn't even last 1d6 rounds. --Ghostwheel (talk) 13:13, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Propose to rename this "We Use Logic Here". Surgo (talk) 16:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
That's already a feat Surgo. Not sure double naming, even among different types, is a great plan. - Tarkisflux Talk 21:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
That's really too bad you feel that way Tarkis because we use logic here. Surgo (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
I did not consider that. Obviously, you are correct. - Tarkisflux Talk 02:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
We already have double naming between Jack of all Trades and Jack of All Trades. We don't need more of it. --Undead_Knave (talk) 04:47, 10 April 2016 (UTC)