Difference between revisions of "Talk:Amaranth Eclipse (3.5e Martial Discipline)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Created page with "== 404 == You know, I really like this discipline. The flavor is cool, the powers are cool, there's just one small problem... ....none of the maneuvers have pre-reqs. Did t...") |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
....none of the maneuvers have pre-reqs. Did they forget them? I'd love to use this but I can't use it without knowing the pre-reqs. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] 13:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC) | ....none of the maneuvers have pre-reqs. Did they forget them? I'd love to use this but I can't use it without knowing the pre-reqs. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] 13:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Why though? That maneuvers traditionally have prereqs doesn't make it a hard requirement that they should have them. I disagree with the winter cleaning tag and this message. [[User:Surgo|Surgo]] 19:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I would generally agree with this. The author probably isn't going to see this, and it is otherwise good. A warning that this discipline is without prerequisites would be useful, but deleting it completely would be a shame. --[[User:Havvy|Havvy]] 20:41, 5 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::I've placed a note on the user's talk page. Thundergod Cid is active around here isn't he? I think he'll see it, and it wasn't my intention of having it deleted, rather I was bringing note what I saw as a glaring flaw to an otherwise perfect work. Now, I would argue that yes, maneuvers should have pre-reqs (the sole exception to the rule is so glaring I swear it was a typo, looking at you Tombstone Hammer....) but that's a debate for another day. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::If you don't think he will notice this, I'll be happy to do the work. Like I said, I like this discipline. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] 00:17, 6 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::Oh, I thought this was one of the transferred disciplines from before I got here. Yeah, Cidolfas, if you want to add pre-reqs. And the number of exceptions is actually quite higher in homebrew than in published material. Also, many of my favorite maneuvers in Tome of Battle don't have pre-reqs despite being at a level they could have them. --[[User:Havvy|Havvy]] 00:32, 6 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Rewriten summary == | ||
| + | The summary looked a bit wordy for a summary, so I summarized it a bit more. Actual content of the page is unchanged, but feel free to undo if anyone's against the change.--[[User:Eromythic|Eromythic]] ([[User talk:Eromythic|talk]]) 05:06, 6 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:06, 6 February 2022
404[edit]
You know, I really like this discipline. The flavor is cool, the powers are cool, there's just one small problem...
....none of the maneuvers have pre-reqs. Did they forget them? I'd love to use this but I can't use it without knowing the pre-reqs. -- Eiji-kun 13:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Why though? That maneuvers traditionally have prereqs doesn't make it a hard requirement that they should have them. I disagree with the winter cleaning tag and this message. Surgo 19:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- I would generally agree with this. The author probably isn't going to see this, and it is otherwise good. A warning that this discipline is without prerequisites would be useful, but deleting it completely would be a shame. --Havvy 20:41, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- I've placed a note on the user's talk page. Thundergod Cid is active around here isn't he? I think he'll see it, and it wasn't my intention of having it deleted, rather I was bringing note what I saw as a glaring flaw to an otherwise perfect work. Now, I would argue that yes, maneuvers should have pre-reqs (the sole exception to the rule is so glaring I swear it was a typo, looking at you Tombstone Hammer....) but that's a debate for another day.
- If you don't think he will notice this, I'll be happy to do the work. Like I said, I like this discipline. -- Eiji-kun 00:17, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, I thought this was one of the transferred disciplines from before I got here. Yeah, Cidolfas, if you want to add pre-reqs. And the number of exceptions is actually quite higher in homebrew than in published material. Also, many of my favorite maneuvers in Tome of Battle don't have pre-reqs despite being at a level they could have them. --Havvy 00:32, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Rewriten summary[edit]
The summary looked a bit wordy for a summary, so I summarized it a bit more. Actual content of the page is unchanged, but feel free to undo if anyone's against the change.--Eromythic (talk) 05:06, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
