Difference between revisions of "Talk:Federscwhert (3.5e Equipment)"
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by Ghostwheel (talk) to last revision by Eiji-kun) |
(Added rating.) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | == Winter Cleaning? == | + | == Ratings == |
+ | {{Rating |rater=Zarathustra21 | ||
+ | |rating=favor | ||
+ | |reason=Good job! | ||
+ | The lack of 1/2 damage bonus if the weapon is wielded with two hands makes a "hand-and-a-half light weapon" (which means it is a weapon inflicting no more than a 1d10 damage, no heavier than 6 lbs and with no penalty due to its weight) to be finessable, even if its just a martial weapon, not exotic. | ||
+ | Every weapon, in general, can have more variants of itself with a more "Slashing", "Piercing" or "Bludgeoning" nature. There are, for example, some models of "Federschwert" more oriented towards "thrusting, so that their type is considered "Piercing". It is also possible to create a fanged-version version of every weapon in general(see "Fang weapon" on this Homebrew) or a flamed-bladed version of bladed-weapon (see "Flame-bladed weapon), for example a "flamed-bladed Federschwert". On the other hand, since the Federschwert is always a weapon allowing the application of the Weapon Finesse feat, it is not possible to create "Fang Federschwert", since it is not possible to have a finesse fang weapon in general. | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | {{Rating |rater=Soslan19 | ||
+ | |rating=favor | ||
+ | |reason=A bastard sword with finesse is possibl in that case, since you gain finesse exchangin Str bonus and hand and half support. Every one-handed martial weapon, if not affected by a penalty due to its weight, can fairly trade 1½ times your Strength bonus to damage for finesse. | ||
+ | }}== Winter Cleaning? == | ||
Not sure if that applies here. The article looks finished. As for the content of the article, I see nothing of particular problem. It's a bastard sword, including exotic, but finesse. In exchange you lose Str and a half two-hand support. Seems sensible. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 04:07, 26 April 2020 (UTC) | Not sure if that applies here. The article looks finished. As for the content of the article, I see nothing of particular problem. It's a bastard sword, including exotic, but finesse. In exchange you lose Str and a half two-hand support. Seems sensible. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 04:07, 26 April 2020 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:07, 7 October 2021
Ratings[edit]
Zarathustra21 favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! | |
---|---|
Good job!
The lack of 1/2 damage bonus if the weapon is wielded with two hands makes a "hand-and-a-half light weapon" (which means it is a weapon inflicting no more than a 1d10 damage, no heavier than 6 lbs and with no penalty due to its weight) to be finessable, even if its just a martial weapon, not exotic. Every weapon, in general, can have more variants of itself with a more "Slashing", "Piercing" or "Bludgeoning" nature. There are, for example, some models of "Federschwert" more oriented towards "thrusting, so that their type is considered "Piercing". It is also possible to create a fanged-version version of every weapon in general(see "Fang weapon" on this Homebrew) or a flamed-bladed version of bladed-weapon (see "Flame-bladed weapon), for example a "flamed-bladed Federschwert". On the other hand, since the Federschwert is always a weapon allowing the application of the Weapon Finesse feat, it is not possible to create "Fang Federschwert", since it is not possible to have a finesse fang weapon in general. |
Soslan19 favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! | |
---|---|
A bastard sword with finesse is possibl in that case, since you gain finesse exchangin Str bonus and hand and half support. Every one-handed martial weapon, if not affected by a penalty due to its weight, can fairly trade 1½ times your Strength bonus to damage for finesse. |
Winter Cleaning?
Not sure if that applies here. The article looks finished. As for the content of the article, I see nothing of particular problem. It's a bastard sword, including exotic, but finesse. In exchange you lose Str and a half two-hand support. Seems sensible. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 04:07, 26 April 2020 (UTC)