Difference between revisions of "Talk:Amaranth Eclipse (3.5e Martial Discipline)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
m |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Why though? That maneuvers traditionally have prereqs doesn't make it a hard requirement that they should have them. I disagree with the winter cleaning tag and this message. [[User:Surgo|Surgo]] 19:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC) | :Why though? That maneuvers traditionally have prereqs doesn't make it a hard requirement that they should have them. I disagree with the winter cleaning tag and this message. [[User:Surgo|Surgo]] 19:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I would generally agree with this. The author probably isn't going to see this, and it is otherwise good. A warning that this discipline is without prerequisites would be useful, but deleting it completely would be a shame. --[[User:Havvy|Havvy]] 20:41, 5 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:41, 5 February 2011
404
You know, I really like this discipline. The flavor is cool, the powers are cool, there's just one small problem...
....none of the maneuvers have pre-reqs. Did they forget them? I'd love to use this but I can't use it without knowing the pre-reqs. -- Eiji-kun 13:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Why though? That maneuvers traditionally have prereqs doesn't make it a hard requirement that they should have them. I disagree with the winter cleaning tag and this message. Surgo 19:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- I would generally agree with this. The author probably isn't going to see this, and it is otherwise good. A warning that this discipline is without prerequisites would be useful, but deleting it completely would be a shame. --Havvy 20:41, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
