Difference between revisions of "Talk:Monk Weapon Focus (3.5e Feat)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - "points=2" to "rating=like")
m (Reverted edits by Havvy bot (talk) to last revision by DanielDraco)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
{{RC Favor
 
{{RC Favor
 
|rater=Havvy
 
|rater=Havvy
|rating=like
+
|points=2
 
|reason=Monks suck, but now a little less.  When I was originally looking at the monk, I was thinking that they should have had this...even before I knew anything about how DnD really works or what balance is.  This raises their balance up a good chunk.}}
 
|reason=Monks suck, but now a little less.  When I was originally looking at the monk, I was thinking that they should have had this...even before I knew anything about how DnD really works or what balance is.  This raises their balance up a good chunk.}}
  

Revision as of 19:02, 4 July 2011

Favor

Template:RC Favor Template:RC Favor Template:RC Favor Template:RC Favor

Question

Does this apply when dual wielding Sai? 2d10 sai in each hand at level 20? It is a bit sary.--Sergejsvk 15:56, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

No worse that one weapon with this feat + unarmed strike, a scorpion kama/no feat + unarmed strike, or two scorpion kamas. This power was purchasable via gold anyway. But to answer, yes, 2d10 for each sai. -- Eiji Hyrule 16:12, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
Why is this a tagged as a fighter feat (not balance level, feat type)? --Andrew Arnott (talk, email) 20:11, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
It seemed a suitable feat for multiclass fighter/monk types to take, being synergistic with the weapon focus tree. -- Eiji Hyrule 13:26, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
On a related note, why is this tagged as a fighter feat (not feat type, balance level)? --DanielDraco 16:58, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Because it brings monks up a tier by giving it some damage dealing options that don't suck. And if you found ways to reduce MAD, you could turn the monk into a fighter level class. At least, that is my understanding of it. --Havvy 22:34, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Their damage potential remains exactly the same. They can just do it from slightly further away now. --DanielDraco 06:07, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
FavoredGhostwheel +
LikedDanielDraco +, Havvy + and Undead Knave +
UncountedRatingTK-Squared +