Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rabbit (3.5e Monster)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
m (→Lagomorph) |
(Added rating.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ==Lagomorph== | + | == Ratings == |
| + | {{Rating |rater=Aarnott | ||
| + | |rating=favor | ||
| + | |reason=Totally awesome. The magic rabbit is a great improved familiar (though perhaps a bit strong at level 5). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Really great article. | ||
| + | }}==Lagomorph== | ||
Rabbits, even magical ones, are not rodents. They're lagomorphs, a much cooler word. You're now remembering that one spell/status in FF6 called Lagomorph that had a rabbit show up. --[[User:Ganteka Future|Ganteka Future]] ([[User talk:Ganteka Future|talk]]) 17:09, 18 March 2014 (UTC) | Rabbits, even magical ones, are not rodents. They're lagomorphs, a much cooler word. You're now remembering that one spell/status in FF6 called Lagomorph that had a rabbit show up. --[[User:Ganteka Future|Ganteka Future]] ([[User talk:Ganteka Future|talk]]) 17:09, 18 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
:Lagomorphs are direct siblings of rodents. The distinction in common vernacular isn't really useful. --[[User:Aarnott|Aarnott]] ([[User talk:Aarnott|talk]]) 17:31, 18 March 2014 (UTC) | :Lagomorphs are direct siblings of rodents. The distinction in common vernacular isn't really useful. --[[User:Aarnott|Aarnott]] ([[User talk:Aarnott|talk]]) 17:31, 18 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:34, 18 March 2014
Ratings
|
Aarnott favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| Totally awesome. The magic rabbit is a great improved familiar (though perhaps a bit strong at level 5).
Really great article. |
Lagomorph
Rabbits, even magical ones, are not rodents. They're lagomorphs, a much cooler word. You're now remembering that one spell/status in FF6 called Lagomorph that had a rabbit show up. --Ganteka Future (talk) 17:09, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
