Talk:Flammenwerfer (3.5e Class)

Balance

Since when has a spammable AoE blind been balanced at High? Especially when it's available at 2nd level. Or the ability to completely negate ranged characters? Or the ability to AoE nauseate enemies? Honestly, I like this class, but it has enough combat utility to potentially put many sorcs to shame (and let's not talk about psions/wilders, who are also in the VH range). --Ghostwheel (talk) 12:18, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

You had a point on blind, and it has been pushed back (the blinding part anyway) to 8th. I suppose negating ranged attacks means Deflect Projectiles, but its just once a round. It's just Deflect Arrows. AoE nausea is at 10th, at which point I don't care, since the superior stinking clouds have been floating around for five levels by then. The spell doesn't require upkeep and constant saves. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 12:50, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Let's give my favorite example; either this against a party of definitely-H-range-characters, or this as part of a party against a DM throwing H-level encounters at the party.

Either way, there's going to be a lot of frustration if half the time the opposing side can barely function... which is a mark of VH-level abilities.

And I meant Fog Cloud more than Deflect Projectiles, since that'll screw over any opposing ranged character, as well as bringing a lot of utility to the class in a way that isn't reminiscent of H-range characters. --Ghostwheel (talk) 13:19, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

I disagree slightly. The level things come online plays a large part where I stick the balance range. A [Death] effect save or die might be fight in fighter games... at 20th. In higher level games they appear at lower and lower levels until wizard level (9th). But, on terms of fog cloud... interesting, but it's available via Smokesticks. I'm sure sure if you can't get more available than that. It's mostly an escape tactic until you can See in Smoke, which is a great ability allowing you to have one-sided concealment. But at the level you get it, I find it appropriate. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 13:55, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Making an argument of the form, "WotC VH classes can get it at level X, so it's fine for a H class as long as I give it later" presumes that the difference between H and VH is purely quantitative, not qualitative. It also presumes that VH class abilities form a logical, consistent, and balanced progression. Both presumptions are patently untrue. H classes can be justified to get access to very limited shutdown abilities. But AoE fog every round is not sufficiently limited, especially when the class is based on AoE damage anyway -- just keep spamming that ability, and it doesn't make a bit of difference whether you can see where the enemies are. Your allies are safe too, because of Precise Fire, which does not require you to actually know where your allies are. So yeah, smokeblast could use a cooldown. I'd say every 1d4 rounds for the high end of H, or 1/minute to be more middle-of-the-road.

I'd argue against allowing them Deflect Projectiles too, on the basis that it is a hard counter. Yeah, it's only 1/round, but not all ranged combatants use barrages. It's seriously strong in the right situation, and should probably involve a roll of some sort. --DanielDraco (talk)

What DD said, just because they come online early in VH games, does not mean that stinking cloud should ever make an appearance in H-level games (or, for that matter, nor should most of the god-wizard spells). That means that both the blind and nauseate rarely come up in H-level play, and if they do then they are severely limited, not spammable, and come at the cost of another ability rather than being tacked on top of everything else you can do. --Ghostwheel (talk) 21:47, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Picture

Would be fitting? --Ghostwheel (talk) 12:20, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

It is fitting, and yes, this is basically Pyro the class. However, I've a different image in mind.... -- Eiji-kun (talk) 12:50, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Notes

I really like the class, but there were a few things I wanted to note. And here they are.

Flammenwerfer Gun is listed as supernatural, and within that entry describes the gun itself. Which sort of implies that the very existence of the object is supernatural. Does the gun vanish in an antimagic field? Either way, you might want to specify.

There are times when you don't want to create a gout of flames that extends most of the length of a football field. You might want to allow the flammenwerfer to choose their range, up to that maximum.

Close Combat Flammenwerfer might need to be tightened up a bit. What about feats like Superior Unarmed Strike? That is a feat, and it is specific to one weapon, so according to your wording it does count. Maybe "If you possess any feats which normally only apply to a single weapon chosen taking the feat, you may apply all of those feats to your flammenwerfer gun in melee. Each feat can only apply once, and a feat only functions in this way if a greatclub is a valid option for it." You might also consider giving them their full fire damage instead of just 1d6, so that it's actually a viable combat option.

You might consider changing Deflect Projectiles to "With a readied action, you can deflect a single projectile as if you had the Deflect Arrows feat, except that you do not need a free hand."

Burn Ro Dah could use some clarity. Is there some particular shape to this blast? The best interpretation I can figure is that he essentially pushes back every creature within 15 feet, but judging from the source material I'd say that's probably not what you want.

I am very much approve that you mimiced the axetinguisher with Critical Flames, but I question the implementation. A flammenwerfer is almost always going to prefer to simply burninate again, because it deals superior damage. Add to that the fact that critical hits are highly variable -- 18-20/x2 and 20/x4 are equivalent when you must roll, but auto-crit abilities make one strictly superior to the other. I would suggest changing it so that it deals extra damage based on flammenwerfer gun damage -- possibly double the base. This is more predictable, and more likely to be something the flammenwerfer actually wants to do.

You refer to the flammenwerfer gun a few times as simply a "flammenwerfer", which is confusing because that is the name of the class. Might want to comb through and fix those.

Improved Critical Flames should likely be rephrased to saying that a creature on fire takes that much damage, rather than dealing it.

Melt Blast should specify that it functions on worked materials rather than just natural materials like the spell (or else it can never actually afffect metal). Because of this, it should also only affect unattended objects -- no insta-sundering armor and weapons.

Burn Duration has no inition action. It also uses the very very imprecise phrasing of "negative effect". What about effects that have positive and negative sides, like rage -- is only the negative part ended? It should probably require an action, and allow the flammenwerfer to choose any single effect (or number of effects).

Phoenix Fire's first sentence should probably be rearranged. It implies that they can make a reflex save to only be reduced halfway to ash.

"destroys maximum hp damage" is rather awkward phrasing. May I suggest "reduces maximum HP by an amount equal to the damage dealt"?

Heat Rocket needs some clarity. Does this take effect only after moving 20 feet, or during the move? (It probably should only apply after 20 feet. The intent to move 20 feet is all well and good, but such intent can easily be spoiled and then you've got a weird retcon situation.) What is the action on the sprint dash?

I get that it's a capstone, but that's not necessarily an excuse to leapfrog well into VH territory -- Irradiate should have less damage than 1d8 Con. Maybe 1d4+1. Or maybe just 3. --DanielDraco (talk) 20:10, 21 September 2012 (UTC)