Talk:Maneuver Finesse (3.5e Feat)

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Revision as of 20:12, 6 November 2014 by Ghostwheel (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Ratings[edit]

It's just Dynamic Potential (3.5e Feat). Did you misread and think he is scaling damage of maneuvers with level? -- Eiji-kun (talk) 00:46, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

I am not sure I understand this rating, this just adjust saving throws not any kind of damage. --Leziad (talk) 21:46, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Hrmm, don't know how I feel about scaling manuever DCs, since I feel that they're different enough from spells that you should have a reason to get new ones... Will think more on it. For now I'll erase the rating... --Ghostwheel (talk) 20:12, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
RatedFavor.png Fluffykittens favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
Not just good, but necessary.
RatedFavor.png Spanambula favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
I think this would work really well with Eiji's variant Combat Maneuver rule. But even for a game where the DM doesn't want to implement the whole thing, this feat helps a lot of initiators who multiclass, without it being an overpowering boost in power.
RatedFavor.png Eiji-kun favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
I like being able to use different ability scores for things.


Ability scores[edit]

Why limit it only to dex? --Ghostwheel (talk) 06:18, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Because it's Weapon Finesse but for maneuvers. That's why it's named what it is and has the pre-req it does. --Undead_Knave (talk) 00:36, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
That seems like an extremely, extremely silly reason. "Because it's like WotC did in the past" shouldn't be the primary reason to limit ourselves. --Ghostwheel (talk) 07:34, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
It's a fluff thing for the feat. Not all feats need universal application. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 08:06, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Mostly what the other said, on the other hand I also made it dex-only thing because of it prerequite feat and the fact I didn't felt completely comfortable with giving gishes more SADness. That said it is perfectly acceptable to make different version of this feat for one's game for each ability scores. --Leziad (talk) 10:51, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
FavoredFluffykittens +, Spanambula + and Eiji-kun +