Talk:Dragon (3.5e Class)
Ratings
|
Sano2213 favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| I like it. It's flavorful. However, you've incorrectly said that this is "Very High" like a sorcerer or wizard, without even as many spells as the bard, and not even being as specialized as the barbarian for melee combat.
It is closer to the power level of the bard than that of the wizard. Decent little bits of versatility, but ...yeah, not as much as the bard. It is a good bit more powerful martially than a bard, but that's not an incredibly potent thing. |
Going colossal is a pretty big deal... --Ghostwheel (talk) 09:29, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Dead Level
Why do they get nothing at level 9? --Ghostwheel (talk) 13:51, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Monstrous Feats
The dragon was listed among the Tome material, and it specifies that only monstrous feats can be selected for the class bonus feats, and yet there don't seem to be any Tome-specific monstrous feats. (The general DnDWiki page for monstrous feats consists 90% of Pokémon feats and the remaining 10% doesn't look like it was made with Tome in mind.) In short, I don't know where to look for compatible feats in that case.
- A couple of feats were written in the Tome of Fiends, and IGTN wrote about 8 more in his very compatible Book of Elements and his abandoned Feral Libram (these last were not in the feat type, but that has been changed - they're here if you want to glance at them right away). You could probably use most of the other monstrous feats though, even the ones that aren't specifically made for the class, so long as the other prereqs are met. - Tarkisflux Talk 21:44, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
- The SRD Monstrous feats really do seem to be the basis for the fiend feats. They give much better swag than SRD General or Fighter feats--you can pick up much extra damage, or stuff like Hover (which I commend to your attention, it's really an interesting one). See http://dnd-wiki.org/wiki/SRD:Monstrous_Feats for the SRD Monstrous feat list. --Genowhirl
