Talk:3.5e Mundane Alchemical Items

Craft DC Property

Is it worth it to have a craft DC semantic property so you could list it on the big table here? I mean in general, 'cause I would totally use that and make any edits necessary to implement it, just wondering if I should I guess. Community go-ahead, as it were. --Ganteka Future (talk) 19:43, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Heck, wouldn't all you need be like [[craftdc::25]]? --Ganteka Future (talk) 20:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

If it's something you want to display in tables or have available to search by, go right ahead. I'm not sure if it would be better to record simply a number or to also record the sub-craft skill as well to be a more generally applicable property.

Either way, we've gone with a more standard wording and spacing for every other property, so we'd want to go with [[Craft DC::X]] instead I think. You'll also need to create the property page Property:Craft DC and give it a number/text type. The default type is page, so without specifying something else it will take your property and try to link you to non existent pages. - Tarkisflux ^Talk 00:07, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, some sort of property to identify alchemy or basketweaving or armorsmithing... could probably also handle item creation feats as entries as well, like Craft Rod or Forge Ring as well, if those things don't have those as specific categories or properties already. --Ganteka Future (talk) 01:12, 2 March 2015 (UTC)