Talk:Focused Weapon Defense (3.5e Feat)
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Ratings[edit]
Tarkisflux dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4. | |
---|---|
It's reasonably powered for its balance I guess, but tiny and potentially uncommon bonuses outside of the PC's hands do not make me enthused for this feat. Quite the opposite actually. |
Eiji-kun likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. | |
---|---|
It feels like something WotC would have made.
Oh, sorry, right, this is a Like, not an Oppose. I mean it looks solid, for Low level as Low level goes. |
More Inclusive[edit]
Since weapon groups have relatively few weapons in them, perhaps choose between Bludgeoning/Piercing/Slashing weapons instead, and make it apply to all of them? That way you have a greater range and it's less specific. --Ghostwheel (talk) 21:03, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- This is not a bad idea, a little off flavor but hey we need to compromise sometime. Alternatively I could add multiple weapon groups... I have an idea. --Leziad (talk) 21:36, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- I feel this applies to virtually all weapons at higher levels at that point, making your choices a little more meaningless... :-3 --Ghostwheel (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- Works for me. --Ghostwheel (talk) 21:59, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- I should have mentioned this more specifically earlier, but it still excludes every natural weapon ever. As long as you only fight humanoids who use your selected weapon group (it's a low level replacement for weapon focus, I don't really care about the growth) it's okayish, but eugh. - Tarkisflux Talk 22:15, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- In that case, might I suggest instead using the PF weapon groups? --Ghostwheel (talk) 22:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)