User talk:David Baker/Master of Control (3.5e Prestige Class)

Ratings

	ThunderGod Cid dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
	I'm putting the nail in the coffin on this one. First, it should have been a short base class instead of being classified as a prestige class. That would have been fine, there's nothing saying a base class has to be 20 levels. Then there's poor English, a lack of clarity on what most abilities do, and half of the abilities being just plain bad.

	Leziad opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	What the others said.

LenKagetsu opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.

It's rare I have a negative opinion on something, but this is just awful. Firstly, you HAVE to take it at first level? That's all kinds of retarded. And why is it a prestige class if it has no requirements whatsoever? Auto-prones, endless invincibility, poorly-written abilities, and is outright broken in all aspects? Even the saving throw table is completely wrong. Not to mention trying to be tanky in a tabletop game doesn't work. This isn't an MMO. You don't get to godmod entire bands of enemies into attacking you just because you screamed at them. This is something that would have to be rewritten from the ground up. As it stands, it's FUBAR.

	Ghostwheel opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	Why is this a prestige class if it has no prereqs? Why is this limited to first level? What does "taunt" even actually do? What does Haste do? Why are we giving +4 con forever from a single dip? I stopped reading at this point because the abilities don't make sense, are poorly worded, and don't feel meaningful.

Formatting

You remembered your tag this time (the 3.5e Prestige Class part) but your formatting is borked, and your author box is missing again. Are you importing these things from the other wiki that looks like us? Would you like some help? Also, you may want to address the talk page of your other class. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 04:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)