User talk:Valentine the Rogue/Chocobos (3.5e Race)
RatingsEdit
DanielDraco opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. | |
---|---|
I saw the five natural attacks, then glanced down to where it says it's ECL 1, and immediately stopped reading. Broken as all hell on that basis alone. |
Havvy opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. | |
---|---|
While the monster portion of Valentine The Rogue's choco stuff is good, this is not. The reasons have already been stated, so I'm not going to reiterate through them. |
Ganteka Future opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. | |
---|---|
With all the work that went into this project, the core of it is rotten, based around this race. It's just not good. 60 foot speed, 5 natural attacks, Animal type, Large size and some other stuff add up to a lot of problems. Players and DMs, stay away. |
animals cant have an int higher than 2. this is a magical beast.--NameViolation 21:03, November 27, 2009 (UTC)
- The status is "in progress"...I don't think the author considers it to be ready for review yet. --DanielDraco 13:58, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
Aarnott opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. | |
---|---|
Animals really shouldn't be a PC type. The Int cap as noted above is an issue. I also have issue with a bunch of other things:
All for LA +0. |
Tarkisflux opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. | |
---|---|
So, you start by getting a bunch of abilities that are too good for an LA+0, ECL 1 race. And then you get to the part where you don't get a bunch of things that you need to interact with other characters in the game. This is straight up bad. |
ThunderGod Cid opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. | |
---|---|
Reiterating what everyone else said above, plus races are supposed to be singular in their format. That's about the only new thing I can add. |
Mimicry is the best form of flattery, or somethingEdit
This made me sad, so I made Awakened Chocobos. Is this less sad? -- Eiji-kun 07:39, 22 July 2012 (UTC)