Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ideasmith/Spellblade (3.5e Class)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
m (Text replace - "|rating=hate" to "|rating=oppose") |
Foxwarrior (talk | contribs) (Added rating.) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
== Ratings == | == Ratings == | ||
+ | {{Rating |rater=Foxwarrior | ||
+ | |rating=oppose | ||
+ | |reason=This class is way too underpowered to be Very High balance. If that is the balance point it will keep, it doesn't deserve to exist. | ||
+ | |||
+ | It's also unexciting. | ||
+ | }} | ||
{{Rating | {{Rating |
Revision as of 04:50, 22 January 2013
Balance Point
Polymorph, Animate Dead, Baleful Polymorph, Bestow Curse, Web, and Major Creation (and minor at that) aren't really rogue-level abilities. --Ghostwheel 03:30, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- Feel free to change the balance point. I was basically guessing.--Ideasmith 04:04, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Incomplete Template
- What needs to be added to remove the incomplete template? The class already has "spells known, how they cast, abilities named", and I am not sure what is covered by "etc.".--Ideasmith 04:04, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Armored Mage or Familiar?
You have a name--text mismatch on your class for the featured called armored mage. You give the benefits of a familiar.
Also, if you aren't going to include what they receive in full, this is a wiki, and linking to the pages that include the rules of what they get would be extremely helpful. --Havvy 04:13, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- Name--text mismatch fixed.--Ideasmith 04:41, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- Where can I find instructions for creating internal links?--Ideasmith 04:41, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- On a wiki, it's [[Pagename]]. For example, linking to the wizard page would be [[SRD:Wizard]]. --Havvy 04:43, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. Links to Adept SRD page now included.--Ideasmith 05:13, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Ratings
![]() |
Foxwarrior opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
---|---|
This class is way too underpowered to be Very High balance. If that is the balance point it will keep, it doesn't deserve to exist.
It's also unexciting. |
![]() |
Havvy opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
---|---|
While the concept of combining the NPC classes might be interesting, it is sparse with class features and otherwise uninteresting disassociated from its method of creation. |