Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ideasmith/Spellblade (3.5e Class)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - "|rating=hate" to "|rating=oppose")
(Added rating.)
Line 25: Line 25:
  
 
== Ratings ==
 
== Ratings ==
 +
{{Rating |rater=Foxwarrior
 +
|rating=oppose
 +
|reason=This class is way too underpowered to be Very High balance. If that is the balance point it will keep, it doesn't deserve to exist.
 +
 +
It's also unexciting.
 +
}}
  
 
{{Rating
 
{{Rating

Revision as of 04:50, 22 January 2013

Balance Point

Polymorph, Animate Dead, Baleful Polymorph, Bestow Curse, Web, and Major Creation (and minor at that) aren't really rogue-level abilities. --Ghostwheel 03:30, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Feel free to change the balance point. I was basically guessing.--Ideasmith 04:04, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Incomplete Template

What needs to be added to remove the incomplete template? The class already has "spells known, how they cast, abilities named", and I am not sure what is covered by "etc.".--Ideasmith 04:04, 18 August 2011 (UTC)


Armored Mage or Familiar?

You have a name--text mismatch on your class for the featured called armored mage. You give the benefits of a familiar.

Also, if you aren't going to include what they receive in full, this is a wiki, and linking to the pages that include the rules of what they get would be extremely helpful. --Havvy 04:13, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Name--text mismatch fixed.--Ideasmith 04:41, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Where can I find instructions for creating internal links?--Ideasmith 04:41, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
On a wiki, it's [[Pagename]]. For example, linking to the wizard page would be [[SRD:Wizard]]. --Havvy 04:43, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. Links to Adept SRD page now included.--Ideasmith 05:13, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Ratings

RatedOppose.png Foxwarrior opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
This class is way too underpowered to be Very High balance. If that is the balance point it will keep, it doesn't deserve to exist.

It's also unexciting.


RatedOppose.png Havvy opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
While the concept of combining the NPC classes might be interesting, it is sparse with class features and otherwise uninteresting disassociated from its method of creation.