Difference between revisions of "Talk:Marksman (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) |
(→A little unbalanced: new section) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|points=2 | |points=2 | ||
|reason=I really like this feat in that it gives ranged characters something that they should get at the start as far as I'm concerned--Dexterity to damage. A suggestion might be the addition of ignoring Soft Cover (such a stupid rule...), the bane of many ranged characters who aren't familiar with Goggles of Foefinding in MIC.}} | |reason=I really like this feat in that it gives ranged characters something that they should get at the start as far as I'm concerned--Dexterity to damage. A suggestion might be the addition of ignoring Soft Cover (such a stupid rule...), the bane of many ranged characters who aren't familiar with Goggles of Foefinding in MIC.}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == A little unbalanced == | ||
| + | |||
| + | For its requirement, it offers two much of a bonus | ||
| + | It completely obsoletes the composite longbow, and if first level even a composite longbow +3 (which a first level wouldn't be able to | ||
| + | afford), is less effective than a feat, than I'd say its pretty overpowered. Take out the dex bonus to damage or make the requirement | ||
| + | a lot higher and it's fixed | ||
Revision as of 15:19, 2 April 2010
Favor
A little unbalanced
For its requirement, it offers two much of a bonus It completely obsoletes the composite longbow, and if first level even a composite longbow +3 (which a first level wouldn't be able to afford), is less effective than a feat, than I'd say its pretty overpowered. Take out the dex bonus to damage or make the requirement a lot higher and it's fixed
