Talk:Suddenly Phantom Train (3.5e Spell)
Ratings[edit]
Dragonexx favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! | |
---|---|
A great damage/SoD that deserves it's high level slot. Also, easily refluffed which is fun. |
Fluffykittens favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! | |
---|---|
(lparchive.org/Breaking-Final-Fantasy-VI/Update 2006/18-suplextrain2.gif)(linking from wiki doesn't seem to work if there is a space in the title) Of course you can suplex a ghost train. |
DanielDraco likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. | |
---|---|
This is special. We're going to rate this.
There are some clarity issues (see below), and some things that con be confusing if misinterpreted (why bother making it a save for half damage if they're going to die when they take the full damage?) but it's a neat spell. |
Havvy likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. | |
---|---|
I Like Trains. No really, I like trains. |
Dual School[edit]
I'd like this to be Conj/Necro, but it doesn't seem to like dual-schooled spells. Wat do? -- Eiji-kun (talk) 01:39, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
(Gets Dual Schools) Thanks Tark! -- Eiji-kun (talk) 06:53, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Comments[edit]
I think you might have made a small mistake here: 'Those affected take 10 points of divine damage per caster level (maximum 40d6) ' What damage exactly?
P.S. Love the spell component. But aside from a beloved wiki user, what's a ghostwheel, exactly? -HarrowedMind (talk) 05:47, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Whoops, 10 per level is right.
- The material component, like any of them without cost, is a joke. X3 Mechanically, it has no cost so it doesn't matter what it is, it's in your spell component pouch. Fluffwise, who knows. The undead spirit of a wheeeeeel. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 06:46, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Sounds Instantaneous, but Isn't[edit]
So with this lasting 1 round, how exactly is damage meted out? By that I mean, does the damage occur immediately? At the start of each respective victim's turn? Every time one enters the area (if they Spring Attack through it, or the like)? Some combination? --DanielDraco (talk) 07:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- As in, a wall that actually blocks passage? I thought that might have been it, but I wasn't sure. There are, after all, plenty of "wall" spells that do no such thing. Maybe it should be specified. --DanielDraco (talk) 19:11, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe adapt portions of wall of force's first paragraph? --DanielDraco (talk) 22:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC)